production / mainCloudflare PagesIstanbul · --:--:--000%

Technical Audit Platform

PROD-01CHECKLISTSESSION-AWARE / EVIDENCE-FIRST0 EXTERNAL ARTIFACTS

Production Readiness Checker

Combine auth, access control, error tracking, backups, CI/CD, secrets, migrations, SEO and mobile failure states into one pre-release score.

PROD-01 / OBSERVED EVIDENCE WORKBENCH

SELF-REPORT + OBSERVED → EFFECTIVE

REPORT TARGET

P0Auth and session lifecycle verified

P0Server-side access rules / RLS exist

P0Secrets are not in the repo or client

P0Data migration path and rollback decision exist

P0Critical loading / empty / error states are designed

P1Backup and restore approach is defined

P1Error monitoring and health signals exist

P1Build / release pipeline is repeatable

P1Abuse / rate limits exist on critical endpoints

P1Title, canonical, robots, sitemap and 404 checked

P1Mobile keyboard, safe-area and small-screen flows verified

P2Product events and conversion measurement defined

P2Incident / operations runbook exists

P2Live-system ownership and escalation path are defined

EFFECTIVE

0/100

SELF

0/100

VERIFIED

0%

EXT. PENALTY

-0

OBSERVED EVIDENCE / 0

Session Scorecard / OSV / SARIF evidence is included in readiness.

Open Evidence Lab →

AC / EVIDENCE REPORT

AC-PROD-01-20260810100444 · METHOD 3.0-session-evidence

PDF / human · MD / repo · JSON / automation

ANALYSIS SUBJECT

HEURISTIC

TARGET NOT PROVIDED

TARGET

P0 / P1 / P2 release controls + external technical evidence

SCOPE

Production readiness verification

EVIDENCE BASIS

HEURISTIC

PROD-01 / EVIDENCE FILE

Production Readiness Checker

0/100 effective readiness · self 0/100 · external penalty -0

EVIDENCE COVERAGE

45/100

CONFIDENCE

LOW

CLAIM BOUNDARY

Self-report and external technical evidence remain separate. Observed external risks can reduce readiness; a clean external scan never auto-verifies checklist controls.

01

Executive brief

0% verified control coverage · 5 P0 blockers

No external technical evidence; score is checklist-only.

02

Findings and decision points

F-1HIGH CONFIDENCE

P0 · Auth and session lifecycle verified

Verified pre-release evidence is missing.

EVIDENCE → E-CONTROL-1

F-2HIGH CONFIDENCE

P0 · Server-side access rules / RLS exist

Verified pre-release evidence is missing.

EVIDENCE → E-CONTROL-2

F-3HIGH CONFIDENCE

P0 · Secrets are not in the repo or client

Verified pre-release evidence is missing.

EVIDENCE → E-CONTROL-3

F-4HIGH CONFIDENCE

P0 · Data migration path and rollback decision exist

Verified pre-release evidence is missing.

EVIDENCE → E-CONTROL-4

F-5HIGH CONFIDENCE

P0 · Critical loading / empty / error states are designed

Verified pre-release evidence is missing.

EVIDENCE → E-CONTROL-5

03

Evidence ledger

E-CONTROL-1USER INPUT

P0 · Auth and session lifecycle verified

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-2USER INPUT

P0 · Server-side access rules / RLS exist

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-3USER INPUT

P0 · Secrets are not in the repo or client

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-4USER INPUT

P0 · Data migration path and rollback decision exist

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-5USER INPUT

P0 · Critical loading / empty / error states are designed

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-6USER INPUT

P1 · Backup and restore approach is defined

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-7USER INPUT

P1 · Error monitoring and health signals exist

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-8USER INPUT

P1 · Build / release pipeline is repeatable

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-9USER INPUT

P1 · Abuse / rate limits exist on critical endpoints

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-10USER INPUT

P1 · Title, canonical, robots, sitemap and 404 checked

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-11USER INPUT

P1 · Mobile keyboard, safe-area and small-screen flows verified

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-12USER INPUT

P2 · Product events and conversion measurement defined

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-13USER INPUT

P2 · Incident / operations runbook exists

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

E-CONTROL-14USER INPUT

P2 · Live-system ownership and escalation path are defined

unknown

No evidence reference supplied.

CONF LOW

04

Method, assumptions and boundaries

ASSUMPTIONS

• Normalized external artifacts depend on the source tool output.

LIMITATIONS

• This is not a penetration test; external evidence does not automatically prove exploitability.

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES

OWASP · Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)

Security readiness should distinguish stated controls from verified technical controls; verification requires evidence, not checkbox assertion alone.

AS-OF 2026-08-09

AWS · AWS Well-Architected Framework

Architecture decisions are trade-offs across operational excellence, security, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization and sustainability; context determines priorities.

AS-OF 2026-08-09

05

Recommended next move

A01Verify P0 blocker controls with real evidence first.

This report is decision support. Observations, derivations, user inputs and heuristics are deliberately separated.

Turn it into a technical decision with FORGE Verify it together

EVIDENCE BRIDGE

OpenSSF Scorecard · SARIF · OSV · SBOM · Coverage

Attach external technical evidence instead of relying on checkboxes.

Scorecard, OSV and SARIF risk findings contribute readiness risk pressure. CycloneDX/SPDX inventory and LCOV/Cobertura coverage are attached as observed context; clean inventory or coverage never auto-verifies checklist controls.

Open Evidence Lab

WHEN TO USE IT

Separate release blockers before moving a prototype to production
Review security, data, observability and mobile failure states at one gate
Establish a real sequence across P0, P1 and P2 work

METHOD / INTERPRETATION

What do P0, P1 and P2 mean?

P0 covers identity, access, secrets, migrations and critical failure states that can directly block release. P1 supports reliable operation with real users; P2 completes operational maturity through measurement, runbooks and ownership.

Is a score of 100 required?

Not every product carries the same risk profile. Cosmetic P2 work should never hide open P0 issues. The weighted score is designed to keep critical gaps visible rather than reduce release judgment to one number.

BOUNDARY

This checklist does not replace penetration testing, security certification, legal compliance or real production observability.

If this output needs to become a real technical decision, move it into the FORGE flow.

Contact

Has your product grown faster than its system?

Send the current situation, your biggest blocker and the outcome you want. We will clarify scope together.

Availability

Open to new consulting and project-based work.

GROWTH / SIGNAL LOOP

Move from reading to a decision.

Booking, feedback and system notes in one low-friction exit.

CNV-01

Technical call

If there is a fit, move directly to a 20-minute call.

CNV-02

Decision blocker

Tell me what is still missing with one signal.